20121108

Paul Solderner by Tom Zwierleir


Paul Soldner: American Master

By Tom Zwierlein

From the March/April 1997 issue of Clay Times
TZ: I know that you and Pete (Peter Voulkos) are contemporaries. What was your relationship like with him in the beginning?
SOLDNER: I was three years older than Pete so he called me "old man." In the first month or so, I was Pete's only student, so we had a very personal student-teacher relationship. We built wheels and kilns together. We went to exhibits together and worked together. Other students (John Mason, Mac McCord, Ken Price, Joel Edwards, Jerry Rothman, Billy Al Bengston, Mike Frimkess and more) began working at the Los Angeles Art Institute. Pete left us alone. We were free to teach ourselves. No assignments, no official critiques and I believe we all got A's. Grades were not important, only working, hanging out together, drinking coffee and night clubbing in L.A. after midnight were important.
TZ: Although you were working during abstract expressionism it never seems apparent in your work. Who or what were your influences?
SOLDNER: I think I was more influenced by Zen and Japanese aesthetic than the New York abstract movement. But Pete was into the abstract movement. Because I was older (and maybe more mature), I tried to find my own way. Sure, I was influenced by Pete's work because I wanted to be. But also, I didn't want to copy him. That's why I involved myself with throwing really tall pots that didn't look like Pete's. We had lots of visitors in the studio, like Tony Prieto (Mills College), Laura Andreason (UCLA), Marguerite Wildenhain, Vivika and Otto Heino, Susan Peterson, etc. Pete took classical guitar lessons and played when he got bored in class. We had a radio playing all the time, classical and popular.
TZ: Can you talk about how you got started building pottery equipment, and did you have any of the skills, like welding, with you when you went to California?
SOLDNER: Because the school was new, the ceramics department didn't have any equipment. We only had a room, a couple of tables and a sink. No clay, no kiln, no mixers, etc. So Pete and I tried building our own wheels because Pete didn't like the ones available commercially! After I designed and built my own wheel, Pete got a purchase order from the school for me to make eight wheels. Then teachers from other schools would come to our school and order some for their shops. I always liked to build things and I learned skills (like welding and casting concrete) when it was necessary or helpful. When I was younger I built my own photo enlargers, strobe flash, photo electric light meters, etc. I also worked on residential construction in the summers.
TZ: Will you tell us about the evolution of your complex, and your visionary uses of materials like concrete and solar power?
SOLDNER: It's hard for me to separate making my sculpture (and pots) from building my own house, or experimenting with solar heat, wine making, mushrooming, architecture, hot tubbing, advertising or my life style. It's all there. I sometimes say clay is the hub of the wheel and exhibiting, teaching, manufacturing equipment-all of the above-are spokes of my wheel of life.
TZ: Paul, tell us about your hot tubs and wine making interests.
SOLDNER: I think hot tubbing, wine making and play are all very natural impulses. It's too bad so many people are hung up about enjoying life.
TZ: I remember when I was at Anderson Ranch, you were looking at it as an alternative to college-a somewhat communal way of living and working-a place where the artists and the facility would develop as a whole. Will you talk about your relationship with Anderson Ranch and what it has become after your 25 years of working there?
SOLDNER: I was involved with Anderson Ranch two times. In 1965 or 66 some Aspen residents asked me if I would teach them how to make pots. I said, "Okay, if you can find a place to work." So they rented a vacant store in Aspen. It worked great. We built our wheels and kilns, etc. but after one year we lost the lease! So we looked for a new place. The Jannes Corporation, which was starting a new development at Snowmass Village (eight miles from Aspen) offered us the temporary use of one of the buildings they bought to make the development. We liked the rustic look of the Anderson Ranch and moved in. Within a year, I got some teaching jobs at the University of Colorado and University of Iowa, which meant I had to leave the Ranch. Other potters used the facility for their own work.
In the '70s, Sherry Heiser moved the "Center for the Eye" photography school to the Ranch. She didn't need to use all the buildings and asked me to start a craft school. When I accepted, we called it the "Center for the Hand."
That's when you came in. I decided to make it a professional school but as an alternative to college. So we did everything colleges don't do. Free tuition, room and board and no credit or degrees. Each student agreed to work four hours a day in return. They had their own studio space and the faculty had to live and work on the ranch. I evolved an "osmosis" theory of learning where they were encouraged to watch the teachers but not to expect to be taught. The idea was more Japanese than American where students are given the responsibility to teach themselves. Everyone lived sort of communally. They took turns cooking and shared the house as a coed dorm. To make a long story short, I left after three years partly because I had gone back to teach in California at Scripps College; also because I had problems with the board. (It was a non-profit organization.) I felt we needed to own the land and buildings if we were to continue. It didn't happen so I left. However, other people picked up the pieces and kept it going, but only as a summer program. Eventually, the land was given to the school and it now functions as the Anderson Ranch Art Center. It has become very important for short-term (two-week) classes. I'm the godfather now, which means I give them my blessing and let them run it any way they want.
TZ: About Soldner Pottery Equipment-I remember the thrill of going to Glenwood Springs, meeting Gene, and picking out my wheel that I still use today. I was very sad after hearing about the fire, and worried that it was the end of Soldner Pottery Equipment.
SOLDNER: I never expected to become a businessman or a manufacturer, but I didn't like the equipment sold to potters. Mostly it was designed by non-potters. Since I was a potter I had ideas of how it should perform, not how many I could sell. Therefore, I taught myself how to make them better. By that, I mean stronger parts, better control of slow speeds and more quiet than other electric wheels. I also tried to keep them low-tech by using off-the-shelf parts and simple, no-nonsense solutions (like wooden table tops, oversized 1-in. bearings, etc.). Eventually my factory burned down, and I never rebuilt it. However, I continued to re-invent the wheel by casting the frame as an integral unit. It held the bearing, motor, table, legs and drive chain. I also made a stripped-down version which was complete, except it has no floor frame. Instead, it hooks on the side of a table like the "Sassy" children's chair you see in restaurants. It is very successful and portable. I used to put it in the overhead compartment of airplanes! My foot pedal is kind of old- fashioned. It consists of only two parts: a variable transformer (to control the voltage/speed) and a solid-state rectifier to make the AC voltage into DC (to run DC motors). Because I don't use transistors, the wave form produced by my low-tech pedal is more pure than that of cheaper transistor pedals. Therefore it is quiet and sensitive in a broad speed range. After the fire, I sold the wheel division to Bluebird. They are making the wheel the way I designed it.
TZ: What about your clay mixers, and the concrete tub concept? I remember the drum mixer you pulled behind your car.
SOLDNER: I invented my clay mixer because (again!) I didn't like what was available: pug mills (which are designed to extrude clay-poor mixers), old dough machines, or modified motor mixers. All of them had problems: too big to move, too obsolete to repair, but most of all, too dangerous to use. Also, because they were made of metal, clay sticks to them (making them difficult to clean) and they rust. When I developed my mixer it had to fit through a 32-in. doorway. It couldn't rust; the clay should release better than metal; it needed to be efficient (HP-to-mixer load ratio); needed to be repairable in the field; should be able to mix 300 lbs. per batch, quickly; and most of all, it needed to be SAFER.
Yes, I built a "flintstone" mixer you pulled behind a car. The wheels were concrete, the drum an old oil drum. It worked okay but even though I published an article on how to make one, most people thought I was joking.
TZ: I used to always look for your ad first in Ceramics Monthly. I doubt many people know that you do the ads yourself, including the photography. The ads often stirred quite a response in the "letters to the editor."
SOLDNER: When I decided to advertise, I told Ginny, let's not do a high-pressure, bragging kind of ad. Let's use humor, and it worked. When I advertised in Ceramics Monthly (about 20 years) I made a NEW ad every month. It takes a lot of work to think up a new idea, photograph it, typeset and design the layout, but that's what I did. The new owners of Ceramics Monthly said they had a problem with my ads so I quit. I'm trying to help Clay Times now with a full page.
TZ: Paul, I'm worried -- are you really a womanizing chauvinist?
SOLDNER: ... No, I don't think so. However, I do love women. I love them for their wisdom, their caring nature, their companionship, and yes, for their beauty. I have many girl friends who I consider my best friends. My male peers often take a male assistant along when they do workshops, but I prefer female assistants, so I often take one with me. They are great.
TZ: When did you get interested in photography? Do you still document your own work?
SOLDNER: Before I was interested in art, I trained myself to be a photographer. This has allowed me to make all the photos for ads and the annual NCECA "titillating" posters. My dark room is simple. A few trays, a stainless tank and an enlarger sitting on top of the washer dryer. I develop the prints on a board over the bathroom sink and wash them in the shower: as low-tech as you can get, but it works. I also document all my work: 35mm slides, a polaroid (for I.D.), a 2-1/4" x 2-1/2" color transparency, and black-and-white. They all go into an envelope giving the data, location and final disposition of each work.
TZ: I watch many of my students and friends struggle to find teaching jobs. Can you talk about the evolution of the MFA graduate, and the field of education today?
SOLDNER: Before the second world war, most artists trained in art schools. They didn't give degrees. After the war, all that GI money caused colleges to grant BAs, MAs, and MFAs in art. Now the MFA is supposed to be terminal, but I hear of people getting the PhD because so many people with MFAs are competing for a few jobs. (This is changing because the GI generation is retiring.)
TZ: What do you think is happening to the tenure system in our universities?
SOLDNER: Schools don't like to tenure teachers because they cost too much to keep around. The idea is that you can hire part-time teachers for a lot less money (with no benefits). It's a sad situation and is the end of the "role model" teacher.
TZ: The Soldner workshops-you strap a handle on a wheel and fly to a distant city, make a number of pieces one day and fire them the next, install a show at a gallery in town, have an opening, party, dance, get back on the plane, leaving us all bewildered and hung. Tell us how this phenomenon came to be.
SOLDNER: I used to do a two-day workshop where I would take my raku tools, forced-draft oil burner, fuel tank, speed controller, brushes and slides. I tried to once-fire the work in steam the next day, then either salt the kiln or pull them out to smoke [raku]. The reason I worked that fast was to downplay the attitude that you needed high-tech, sophisticated equipment to make clay art. (Most of the beautiful works seen in museums were made without electric wheels, gas kilns, or the clay and glaze stores.)
TZ: It must be difficult to keep track of work, especially with galleries and collectors all over the country. I have a piece of yours that has a serial number on it, and you signed it with a marker! How do you feel about the importance of a signature or chop?
SOLDNER: Through the years, I have used different marks, signatures and stamps to identify my work (even a cast of my belly button). Now my logo is trademarked. Signatures are only important for collectors and historians. The work is the real signature.
All my work (in the last 20 or so years) is dated. The first number is the year it was made. The second number is the chronological number when it was made. Also the Soldner Logo was made into a chop. I try to use it also but sometimes I forget!
TZ: Your work has always seemed to be affordable. Will you talk about what seems to have established the pricing?
SOLDNER: Pricing my work has always been difficult. I tended to price too low according to my wife, so I let her help. Price is determined by many factors: reputation, rareness, collectors (what the market will bear), age, etc. But the most important is the quality and uniqueness of the work. Getting the work out and having it documented also helps.
TZ: I remember your coffee can glaze recipes going into a brown paper bag for mixing: the stacking of pots into kilns like logs, and a very basic clay body: sand from a gravel pit and fireclay from the building supplier. How do you come to a medium so vast and complex and work in such a casual way?
SOLDNER: I like to reduce the complex to its simplest form. So I'm more interested in concepts than in rules. As a result I guess people see my low-tech ways of making clay and glazes as casual. But I know (from experience) what I'm doing and how to make it work. For example, I now make sigillata and use it within 30 minutes! None of the usual procedures-it's just 25% ball clay and 75% kaolin dissolved in water. The secret is to apply it thin (like skim milk). I don't need to settle it, ball mill it, or separate it. The simplicity shocks some people.
TZ: Where are you doing most of your work and how are you firing it?
SOLDNER: Most of my work is done in a workshop. Therefore, it's all over the world. Sometime, after it's bisqued, I have it sent back to me or I go there and finish it (mostly low-fire salt). Sometimes I have to build a kiln or use whatever is available, even wood fired, low-salt. For my work, I need any kiln where I can introduce salt in the flames.
TZ: Are you still doing a lot of traveling and as many workshops?
SOLDNER: Traveling and doing workshops more than ever-an average of two or three a month-somewhere over 500 but I've lost track. Now, I'm doing a lot overseas.
TZ: Paul, as we near the next millennium, do you have any insights on the object makers?
SOLDNER: Object makers will continue as long as they are interested. I see an artist's lifestyle as being part of and similar to their work. When you stop working, that's it. Artists are never satisfied. They don't need to read about art: they need to experience it.
Happy potting

Pete Pinnell


Loosely Speakingely Speaking

By Pete Pinnell

From the November/December 1997 issue of Clay Times.
Most potters I know are interesting, literate, thoughtful people. They read widely, think deeply, watch public television, and do everything that one is supposed to do to be considered an intellectual. So why is it that these same people seem to think there are only two adjectives in the English language? The adjectives I'm referring to are, of course, "loose" and "tight."It seems that no matter who is doing the writing (or speaking), they still seem to end up attaching one or the other of these appellations to every pot. After hearing these terms so widely used for so many years, I decided it might be interesting to find out what they really mean.
Webster's Dictionary lists nine different definitions for the word "tight," and most of them really add little to the understanding of ceramic art. Number one, "so close in structure as to prevent passage or escape" might be used to describe a lidded vessel, but says little stylistically. "Marked by unusual tension" and "difficult to cope with" might apply if one didn't like the work, but are actually intended for phrases like "tight lipped with anger" and "in a tight spot." Definition number 6, "somewhat drunk,"appeals to me, though I doubt it's the meaning that most critics intend.
The only definition that seems to apply is number 7:
a) "characterized by firmness or strictness in control or application or in attention to details"

b) "marked by control or discipline in expression or style: having little or no extraneous matter."
The problem with these definitions is that they have little to do with the implications of the word "tight" as many potters use it. For instance, I can remember watching a workshop by a well-known "loose" potter who took a lot of time and who exercised a great deal of 'control' and 'attention to detail' in applying a handle to a mug...much more time and care, in fact, than I (a reputedly "tight" potter) ever did. That same potter worked in the Leach tradition, a philosophy that definition "7b" describes with great accuracy. Yet one usually hears that people who work out of this tradition are "loose" potters. Well, this led me to look up loose.
Loose, as it turns out, has even less which applies to our situation. My favorite definition is 1c, "produced freely and accompanied by raising of mucous." Okay, I know they're talking about a "loose cough," but I like it anyway. Number 4b: "lacking moral restraint: unchaste" is also appealing. The definitions that seem to most closely approximate the way potters use the term still are not an exact match. Definition 5a: "not tightly drawn or stretched: slack;" 5b: "being flexible or relaxed;" and 6b: "permitting freedom of interpretation" could all pertain to pots. Number 6a probably comes closest, but borders on the insulting: "lacking in precision, exactness, or care." Lacking in precision or exactness could be used to describe a lot of pottery, but I doubt many potters would want to admit a lack of care.
What becomes clear from this exercise is that the way we (the American ceramics community) use these words is entirely different from how the rest of the English speaking world uses them. Even within our own small group, these words can take on many layers of meaning. Tight can mean "precise" or "controlled," words that make no qualitative statement. It can also imply "constrained" or "lacking in expression." Ching Dynasty porcelains, Mimbres bowls, and Iznik plates were all made with precision and control, but certainly none of these lacks in expression. If I were to describe them as tight, how would you know my intentions?
Loose (as potters use it) seems often to mean "done with a lack of control," though I know many potters who are typed with that term who work with a great deal of care and control. The meaning most often implied seems to be "a pot that is made in a fluid style that expresses the plasticity of clay and employs surface information that refers to the throwing process." At least that is the way I have understood it, but what the heck is "loose" about that?
The entire purpose of a critique or a critical writing is to cast illumination and build understanding. The problem with these terms is they fail to do that, and often tend to accomplish the opposite: to polarize rather than communicate. All of which leads me to this, a modest proposal:
I propose that we call a ten-year moratorium on any use of the words "loose" or "tight" in any ceramic discourse. I know this will be difficult: we may actually have to wake up and start thinking during student critiques. In order to begin the process, I humbly nominate the following:
Instead of "tight," use "precise, careful, exacting, rigorous, rigid, restrained, constrained, constricted, inflexible, austere, severe," or "stiff."
Instead of "loose," use "relaxed, free, fluid, plastic, unfettered, unrestrained, extravagant, slack, flabby," or "limp."
See, that wasn't so hard, was it? Notice that my brief list includes terms which more clearly imply positive or negative qualities than the words they replace. That's the way we should be Communicating: clearly and succinctly, with all the implications of our statements open for appraisal.
I'm probably making a mistake by even starting with the "L" and "T" words. It makes more sense to talk about what I hope to see (and not see) in the work. I enjoy viewing art that is expressive, eloquent, meaningful, rich, significant, revealing, revelatory, suggestive, vivid, alive, demonstrative, lively, responsive, and spirited. I'm less interested in the banal, commonplace, drab, dull, inane, insipid, vacuous, impassive and indifferent.
One of the ways that the "crafts" world is criticized by the "fine arts" world is for our lack of any real critical analysis of ceramic art. It just might help if we paid a little more attention to our use of language. So, loosen your thesaurus, tighten up your thought process, and join the campaign! And, in the inspiring words of an old TV commercial, "Thank you for your support."
My special thanks to Merriam-Webster's Online (dictionary and thesaurus) at www.m-w.com.

Peter Voulkos


Voulkos Speaks

Interview by Rick Berman

From the November/December 1996 issue of Clay Times

AUTHOR'S PREFACE:

In May, 1978, Peter Voulkos came to do a workshop at Callanwolde Art Center, where I worked at the time. Pete had served as professor of ceramics at the University of California, Berkeley, since 1959 (he retired in 1985). I had followed his work and heard so many stories about him that I couldn't wait to watch him in action and see for myself what he was really like. Well, it's very hard to explain exactly what happened, but let's just say, "things changed." People's work changed dramatically, there were several marriages and divorces, people quit their jobs to become potters, political correctness was bombed back into the stone age, and life in general has never been the same since. On July 26 of this year, I spoke with Pete in Belvidere, NJ, where he had traveled to do a workshop with Paul Soldner at Peter Callas' studio. These were his comments:
RB: Pete, you've been such a catalyst for so many people. How did it happen?
VOULKOS: I don't know. See, I never know 'til somebody tells me. Ten years later, somebody'll say, "I just want to thank you. You changed my life. You changed my life completely." I say, "I did? Was it for the better?" And they say yes.
It's happened a lot. Years later, something you said 10 years ago just kicks in...
Teaching was a very important part of my life. Teaching people how to think. I didn't care what they did later. If you gotta fry hamburgers, do a good one. Be the best carpenter there is, but you've got to learn about freedom, and how to be free and make decisions...you can't make a decision unless you have a feeling of freedom.
I didn't know anything about teaching, really, but I just taught by rote. You watch me, and something rubs off. That's the way I taught. Every semester, I'd say, "Just watch me." I don't show slides; materials are very minimal. Just a couple of lousy glazes, that's all.
You gotta watch me, then I'll try to help you. I don't want anything that looks like production ware. If I see a teapot in there, it's out the door. No, no. Next thing you know, you come in the morning and there are 10 teapots sitting there. Wait a minute. I didn't allow any of that. You sit there for a quarter on the wheel and do cylinders. I want aesthetic cylinders. They say, "What's an aesthetic cylinder?" I say, "I'll let you know as soon as you get one. So, that one is, but that one's not. Now what's the difference? You got to point it out, this one is ugly and this one isn't. What's ugly? Well, it's a hard thing to explain, but that's ugly. It just doesn't transcend anything, ya know.
RB: This question has to do with how the great art systems of the world, i.e., Egyptian, Greek, Islamic, Native American, Aztec, Tibetan, etc. came into being. My feeling is that the art of these civilizations was inspired by a very small group of people or possibly even one very powerful personality or Shaman. I don't want to embarrass you, Pete, but do you think you are one of these personalities?
VOULKOS: I don't even know where to start. When I go back into time, these beautiful things were made, cities ten deep, Jesus Christ, what happened there? Huge pyramids, stones as big as a house. They can't even do it today. That stuff just boggles my mind. It's been happening for thousands of years. You can't help but be turned on by it. You gotta be dead not to respond.
Everything's related ever since the universe started. Time passes. Things happen, then they disappear. That continuous thing, that energy...not really one person. Some-times it will peak in one person, but it's a combination of everything around you. You're responding to it all the time, whether you like it or not. Like in my situation, I didn't intend on doing anything, really...I mean, I didn't even know who I was. Everything just fell into place. I don't know whether it was just timing or luck or whatever it was, but it just happened that way. All the moves just seemed to be the right moves. It just happened. Every once in a while, you read about me starting a revolution. Well, number one, I don't like guns...any kind of revolution will be within myself. I like to discover things through my own self. I didn't go into a museum 'til I was about 30 years old. I was seein' all this stuff, and started thinkin'. I wondered, what were they thinking? What were they eating? What were they doing? You start getting that humbling experience. You start thinkin' about higher powers, the Buddha, the Hindus and all of that. That's a tough one to answer.
RB: Would you talk about your almost 20-year partnership with Peter Callas? The wood-fire years...
VOULKOS: It was not the easiest transition in my life, but it was a very important one. I wanted to stress that with Callas. He's been very important. He wanted me to try it, and I kept saying no, no, I don't want to screw around. I finally met him and said no. A year went by, and he finally got me to come up to the kiln. I wasn't convinced, so I actually threw some stuff in his studio and he fired 'em and I looked at 'em and said there's something here, something raw. I was convinced. It's been 'bout 18 years. That's the way I've been firing ever since. He fires the kiln. At first, it was hard. We'd get into arguments about firing, and I would just leave. Sometimes, he'd kick me out...not here, the old studio. It was an important part of my life when I changed over. I didn't like the work that much in the beginning, but I knew there was something there. So my work started to change so it would accept the fire better than the work I had been making. It got heavier and more ragged. So you'd divert the flame right, you know, and at first, I'd do drawings on them and they would get covered up with this slimy looking stuff and I said, "Don't ever mess with the drawings. Don't cover up the marks with wood ash."
That was an important part of me. I'll leave you alone with the fire, but you've got to understand what I need out of that firing. You got to take what I've got on there and make it better...than I could ever make it. Yeah. So it started out that way and pretty soon, the stuff started comin' out. We'd discuss on each piece where it goes in the kiln. He knows exactly where to put it now, anyway, but this plate goes in the fire box and this is the bottom of the plate...I want this down in the ash so there's a horizon in there, you know, there's always a horizon in there.
He knows exactly how to put 'em in there. I don't even have to tell him, and he doesn't screw it up. So after a few firings, a few years, it took a few years, but we began to understand each other. We went through a lot of bad times together, that's for sure...a lot of bad years. He learned a lot and so did I, so that's where we are today. He understands the way I work and the way I feel and I understand his feelings. So it's that kind of collaboration, you know.
He knows when I'm working on something, you don't come up and say, "This is not right. I don't like this part." I'd say, "You shut the hell up. That's mine. You don't tell me how to do my work and I don't show you or tell you how to fire." We understand that. And then, when we're working together, puttin' parts together, I'd say, "Don't touch that part. Don't touch it! I don't want to see something there. I don't want any finger marks on it! Just keep your hands off. You just work inside. You're internal affairs--I'm external affairs."
Okay. He backs me up. So it's that kind of collaboration. It's not like we stand back and say, "What do we do now?", like some people when they collaborate, they all get together and have a good time at it. No, I don't like that. I could never do that. Like Leedy always wanted us to make tiles together--get away from me! He talks about collaboration in that article, but I say, that's not right. I never collaborated with him or anyone else, ever. I mean, you don't collaborate on your art with somebody. That's your own personal and only thing that you have that's yours, period. Everything else is external and it belongs to the world, ya know. But you got that one thing and that's yours. That's the only thing you have. You could take everything else away from me, but you're not going to take that. Period. Nobody's going to say, "Put this here, put this there." I'm not a decorator, ya know. Once I could understand the wood and he could understand me, I liked this type of firing better than anything else. It's taken all these years to get it together, but, well, it was only last year that I got my own room out here in New Jersey.
RB: I was totally fascinated by Jim Leedy's monograph published by Studio Potter, "Voulkos by Leedy." This is the way I understood the section that he called your "heroic period": You left California in the mid '80s, hid out in his studio in Kansas City with nobody knowing where you were, and worked primarily on two huge stacks for 2 or 3 years. Is this true?
VOULKOS: Umm...not quite. No, no, no...back and forth. I'd go for maybe a week or two weeks, then back home.
RB: Exactly when was that?
VOULKOS: Callas had to leave his studio in Piermont in '85. Couple or three years, there we were, looking for a new place. Did our first firing in Belvidere in 1989. It was in there somewhere. Yeah. Anyway, I went back and forth and kept working in Oakland, too. I was working on the collages and monotypes and then I'd go to Kansas City every month or so to work on the big stacks. I made a bunch of plates, too, that I used for parts. Sometimes, I'd use 8 or 10 plates in a stack. I had these two big pieces in the studio, covered up. Pieces of clay all over the place after a couple of years. I would uncover them and look at them and do a lot of thinking--just get into myself and look at them. Then I'd cover them up, go to the airport, and leave, not even work. I'd go with the intention of working, but I'd get there and something else would turn me on. Sometimes, I'd just stay in the studio and read or play the guitar. Then the next time I worked on the stacks. Yeah...this went on for a couple of years.
RB: Pete, would you consider this period comparable to a vision quest in a so-called primitive culture?
VOULKOS: I never thought of it like that, but I guess it could be. I don't know...everybody thought I was just going nuts, but I didn't think so. I enjoyed it. It was part of my life that I really liked and I did a lot of work, too. I mean, I wasn't just sittin' there watching TV or anything like that. No. I remember eating a lot of peanut butter sandwiches and drinking a lot of cokes. I'd play the guitar, work on the stacks, and just sit by myself.
I had a bed there, and a refrigerator, and I'd make sandwiches when I got hungry. I'd go out to eat maybe once a day, if I got out of there. I'd just go up there and tweak out.
It just happened. It was nothin' I really planned. I was on a trip--finding myself.
I had gotten everything I wanted out of those things workin' on them. I couldn't finish them. I couldn't resolve them. They would change each time a little bit, ya know. One piece was really tough. I got to a point where I didn't want to deal with it anymore. I asked Leedy to break 'em up. I didn't want 'em around. It was important to me that they weren't for retail, out there somewhere...
Anyway, that time was like a big event in my life. There are certain things that happen that change your life drastically. That was one of them.
RB: Pete, what about resistance to you and your work? People wanting you to be a certain way...
VOULKOS: People used to eat me up. I've gone into big conferences and people would stand up and say, "Go to hell, Voulkos!" Well, I'd usually have a good comeback. People would get so gassed up at those NCECA conferences. They'd get pretty wild. They'd tell me what an ass I was, then it would come down to they never met me at all, just what they read someplace or just surmised by looking at my work someplace--never meeting me--they thought I was just the vilest person they ever knew. I said, "I don't even know that person. How could they make that stupid assumption?"
Well, this is what happens. These people are out there, no doubt about that. I mean, this is the stuff you deal with along the line.
RB: If you had a chance to own any piece of art in the world, what would it be?
VOULKOS: One of Callas' tea bowls! Okay, there really isn't anything that I'd like to own. I don't covet anything. I don't sit there and wish that I had it, you know. You see a lot of great paintings and stuff in museums, but I don't exactly want to own them. I don't have anything of mine; just some remnants of things that didn't sell at the time. I don't have too much of anybody. I do love the old Japanese tea bowls. Millions of bowls were made to get to that one. It takes them days and days and days, just like me workin' on a stack, to get the whole universe in a tea bowl. I had a vision once that I was a potter out of Kyoto someplace, dressed in those weird robes and stuff. The year was about 1250 A.D. I swear to Christ that I was around at that time. The Kamakura period. The last time I was in Japan, I found this little cup in an antique shop. The guy said it was made in the Kamakura period. I was just taken by it, of all the stuff in that store. It was pretty cheap, so I decided I'd better buy it--I might have made it! Yeah, yeah...
Anyway, I could never be a collector, got to have one of those, no. I wouldn't want it. No. If I were going to spend money, I would travel, discover new things. Just like you go to India all the time. Who needs a damned $20,000 plate? You gotta be nuts!
RB: To my way of seeing, you're one of the few people making art that has gotten better every year, always going somewhere else.
VOULKOS: Well, first of all, I don't believe in mistakes. It's an ongoing process. It's a matter of decision making. Being able to get rid of all the garbage and forget about it. It's like being in a recovery program. You've got to get rid of all the crap that's in you, get a new life. Don't dwell on the crap anymore. It just brings you down. Don't blame anybody but yourself. You make your own decisions and are responsible for the results. A mistake is nothing but a learning process. It's a slow curve, it goes up real slow. I try to think about transcending myself all the time, both intellectually and emotionally.
I do think my work just keeps getting stronger or to the point, so I must be doing something right. Every time I approach it, there's always something new for me. Every time I do a thing like this workshop which I love, I'm afraid to start because I know I'm going to have to test my brain. Each time I do one of these, I know it's going to be something different. I don't know what it's going to be, just depends on what happens. I've always been on the polar side of things. I have to screw things up. Like somebody said about Viet Nam: "We've got to wipe it off the map in order to save it." Wow!
But, uh, anyway...if I'm in the right mind set, I do all right--everything comes together.

Bonnie Seeman



Artist Profile: Bonnie Seeman

Bonnie Seeman has participated in numerous international and national exhibitions including Art Basel, Switzerland; the World Ceramic Biennale, Korea; Arco Art Fair, Spain; and FIAC, France. Her works are in many public and private collections. She is the recipient of grants such as the Louis Comfort Tiffany Foundation Biennial Award, and two Florida Individual Artist Fellowships. She has demonstrated and lectured throughout the US, and her work has been widely published. She currently serves on the board of Watershed Center for Ceramic Arts, and has been a Florida Arts Fellowship panelist. She received a MFA from the University of Massachusetts/Dartmouth (‘96), and a BFA from the University of Miami 

 Artist Statement I am very interested in the utilitarian object and how it can be used as a means of narration. My work blends the macabre with the beautiful, which acts as a metaphor for the fragility and resiliency of life. By using my interest in morphology and anatomy I present the viewer with a detailed examination of the living structures of the natural world. The juxtaposition of the botanical and anatomical elements can simultaneously be jarring, disquieting, and beautiful. This dichotomy also enhances the tactile quality of the work enticing personal interaction with the viewer.


Bonnie Seeman

Ecumene: Global Interface in American Ceramics



Hello faithful readers!
It's been a while since my last entry, but I'm happy to say that this issue is full of excitement and buzz to make up for it. Allow me to jump straight in and introduce to you the wonderful world of Ecumene!

What is Ecumene you may ask--well it is, in their own words, the Global Interface in American Ceramics--a national and international juried exhibition developed and sponsored by NCECA. Literally thousands (I heard over 4,000 artist applied!) of people applied but only the top 30 was selected. This event is projected to draw hundreds of international artists, curators, writers and leaders in the ceramics field. Selected works will inspire and awe for years to come.

The title of the show Ecumene: Global Interface in America Ceramics reflects current American ceramic practice that is part of a larger global dialogue in which artists have access to a tremendous amount of historical and contemporary art information, inspiration and images. This New World of Art is a transglobal cultural movement of which America is a full partner. Ecumene also refers to the individual practice of artists in selecting the most relevant, appropriate and meaningful elements from this vocabulary to communicate through their art. The exhibit is intended to survey current America ceramic practice in light of this globalization. Ecumene features diverse works incorporating clay as a primary medium of creation, conceptualization and expression. It was curated by NCECA Exhibitions Director Linda Ganstrom; Santa Fe Community College's Director of Exhibitions Clark Baughan and Associate Professor of Ceramics James Marshall, with special guest curator Jane Sauer, owner of the Jane Sauer Gallery in Santa Fe.

I attended the the exhibition which ran from August 29 - September 20, 2012 at the School of Arts and Design,Visual Arts Gallery at Santa Fe and had the opportunity to interview three greatest ceramic artists in the US today.

My favorite artist (so excited to catch her!!) is one of the best ceramic sculptor in the US today, Rebeca Gilling --with her piece titled, 'In the Recesses of Agnes' Mind.' I think you'll agree with me that it is simply stunning and was one of the real highlights of the show. Can you believe...I got shake her hand! Maybe the talent will pass on to me... 

Rebeca Gilling

My second artist, Kari Rives had a lovely piece titled simply: 'Spot'
Kari studied at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. Her work is beautiful simplicity and great to see a piece that isn't too elaborate which appeal to all genres. It's the kind of work when I see makes me think, I can do that too' but it isn't quite THAT simple.


Kari Rives

My third artist and coming third place is Christine Golden with a thought-provoking title:Jenny's
Christine Golden comes from Flagstone Arizona and her piece is quite raunchy--I think!. Either way I love her style and unique blend of colors and oxides that bring out the purity and slight debauchery of this piece--what do you think?


Christine Golden

Bryan Hiveley

Artist profile: Bryan Hiveley



My sculptures present surface textures that are candy-like and color-saturated; they reverberate in the space between oppositional constructs such as artifice/natural, synthetic/organic.  My goal is not to directly mimic specific objects in nature, but rather to suggest ambiguous biomorfic forms with no discernable identity. The work plays on our attraction to and dependence on idealized, genetically-modified, hot-house-grown aspects of nature; it offers a sanitized, animated version of a living being that has been stripped of a unique biologic identity.  They are Disneyfied, petting-zoo-friendly forms that have been carefully shaped and perfected.  They are well beyond the origin of any offensive physical function or messy tissue that could decay, age, pucker or scar.




Erin Furimsky

Combining Stamped Underglaze Decoration 

with Shellac Resist on Pottery





Lars Westby


Tips for Making Multiples for Ceramic Wall Sculptures


Not surprisingly, I create these platters in the same manner as I make my sculptures. I normally start by picking a drawing from my sketchbook. From that sketch, I create an outline of the form on a board to scale. In the case of the Quatrefoil Platter, using solid clay, I model one of the four repeated petal shapes that make up the general shape (1). I then make a mold of that shape, and from that mold press four petals that I put together on my board with the outline to create the whole platter form. Next, I make a mold of the upside down solid platter form to create a basic press/slump mold. A slump mold allows me to control the thickness of the outside rim, varying it from thick to thin. I use a rubber rib and small coils of clay to get this effect and to also form the inside contours and edges (2). When the platter sets up to leather hard, I flip it out of the mold and attach feet to the bottom (3). I then flip it back over and clean up the edge with a rib and sponge.

I use a red earthenware clay body, firing it to cone 04 in oxidation. The glaze surface for these platters comes from my sculptural work as well. I apply the glaze in a single thick coat using a small Chinese bristle brush. Once the whole piece has one coat of glaze, I will go back and add hatching marks or other simple patterns to melt over the first coat (4). One unique aspect of this glaze is how it pulls away from itself as it melts and flows downward to create a dual shiny and matte surface. This layered effect and the pooling of the glazes on the bottom areas of the form creates movement and a dynamic surface quality that I feel really brings the pieces together.

Lars Westby received a BFA in cermics and a BA in art history from Penn State University in State College, Pennsylvania, and an MFA from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He is currently a resident artist at Baltimore Clayworks in Baltimore, Maryland. To see more of his work, visitwww.larswestbyclay.com.

retrieved from: http://ceramicartsdaily.org/ceramic-art-and-artists/ceramic-sculpture/tips-for-making-multiples-for-ceramic-wall-sculptures/